The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

Advertisement
The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

La Voz ad
De Anza budget cuts and DASG’s role in supporting the school
FHDA community shares concerns about college safety

FHDA community shares concerns about college safety

June 25, 2023

Incoming chancellor announces plans for the district

Incoming chancellor announces plans for the district

June 10, 2023

District board overturns Measure G megaprojects and establishes timeline for spending decisions

District board overturns Measure G megaprojects and establishes timeline for spending decisions

June 9, 2023

View All
ISP’s first in-person year-end celebration after pandemic
ESL students share talents at spring celebration

ESL students share talents at spring celebration

June 28, 2023

Graduates get creative for ‘grad cap decorating’

Graduates get creative for ‘grad cap decorating’

June 27, 2023

Recap of super bloom season: Preserve our floral splendor

Recap of super bloom season: Preserve our floral splendor

June 23, 2023

View All
Ghost students create rigged system for community colleges
Rising costs of textbooks weigh students down

Rising costs of textbooks weigh students down

June 12, 2023

Apple Airtag threatens privacy

Apple Airtag threatens privacy

June 4, 2023

Lack of in-person classes hurts student education

Lack of in-person classes hurts student education

June 4, 2023

View All
‘Super Mario Bros. Movie’: Extraordinary box office success
Netflix’s new hit series ‘XO, Kitty’ shines with cultural diversity

Netflix’s new hit series ‘XO, Kitty’ shines with cultural diversity

June 16, 2023

DA Voices: What project are you working on?

DA Voices: What project are you working on?

June 16, 2023

‘Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3’: Marvel’s best movie since ‘Endgame’?

‘Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3’: Marvel’s best movie since ‘Endgame’?

May 23, 2023

View All

Email searching scandal a distraction from main problem:

Widespread cheating by Harvard undergraduate students
Email+searching+scandal+a+distraction+from+main+problem%3A

Harvard University searched the email accounts of 16 resident deans to determine who leaked information about how the deans should advise students implicated in the spring 2012 cheating scandal.
The search found that one of the resident deans, who acts as an academic mentor and lives in the dormitories, forwarded a confidential administration email to a student the dean was advising, and did not directly release it to news outlets.
The events strike some as an invasion of privacy, however the administration committed only a violation of internal policies for which it should apologize for.
Harvard’s information technology department queried only the subject lines of emails in the deans’ accounts used for official university business, according to a statement by Michael Smith, dean of the faculty of arts and sciences, and Dean Evelynn Hammonds.
Harvard faculty policy states that the university can search these accounts, but only after giving advanced notice, Jake New wrote in the Chronicle of Higher Education.
Smith and Hammonds acknowledged that faculty members were not told of the search until almost six months after it occurred.
They defended the university’s actions as protecting the privacy of the resident dean who forwarded the email as well as the students implicated in the cheating scandal.
Most of the frustration directed towards the University’s administration stems from a gulf between the protections guaranteed by policy, and the privacy protections expected by faculty members.
“I think what the administration did was creepy,” Mary C. Waters, a Harvard sociology professor, told the New
York Times.
“This action violates the trust I once had that Harvard would never do such a thing,” she said.
“From a strictly legal standpoint, employees generally do not have a right to privacy when using their employers’ computers or e-mail services,” New wrote.
While recent events may unsettle the Harvard faculty and privacy advocates, they distract from the more serious cheating scandal.
Of the 279 students enrolled in the “Introduction to Congress” course in spring semester 2012, nearly half may have collaborated or plagiarized their answers on a take-home final exam, reported The New York Times.
The university forced out around 70 students in March 2012 but did not specify the exact number of students it disciplined in other ways.
More important than who cheated on the exam is why such a large portion of the class did so and thought it
was acceptable.
Some of the accused students said most thought collaboration on take-home tests, while not allowed, was widely accepted.
Other students said they simply compared notes.
Whatever the reasons, the case underscores widespread issues of academic dishonesty.
Surveys of college and university students indicate that students have relaxed opinions towards behaviors like collaboration, acquiring previous tsts online, or learning a test’s questions before taking the exam.
(Professors overwhelmingly regard these as
serious offenses.)
A study in the Journal of Business Ethics found that increased availability of online tools, such as copy and paste and previous papers led to higher rates of plagiarism.
“Studies of student behavior and attitudes show that a majority of students violate standards of academic integrity to some degree, and that high achievers are just as likely to do it as others,” Richard Perez-Pena wrote in The New York Times.
“Moreover, there is evidence that the problem has worsened over the last few decades.”
Before we address concerns of privacy in the workplace, we should try to solve the problem of academic dishonesty endemic in
our society.
 

Story continues below advertisement
Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

La Voz Weekly intends this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments should be respectful and constructive. We do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks or language that might be interpreted as defamatory. La Voz does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a valid name and email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comment.
All La Voz News Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest