The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

Foothill-De Anza must act on hope, not fear

In the July 9 meeting of the FHDA board of trustees, Chancellor Judy Miner announced the board’s decision to remove a $800 million facilities bond from the November ballot, postponing the vote to 2020. This decision is a culmination of the lack of communication and unity that has permeated the district’s deliberations for far too long.

The district received the bond positively in polls but Miner cautioned that positive polling does not guarantee success. The bond is for the construction, renovation and maintenance of facilities, and the board acknowledged its potential to be used for industry-grade equipment and technology to bolster workforce training. Workforce training, along with transfer, is the highest priority of polled community members.

But, fear of “tense labor negotiations, revenue uncertainties…impending position eliminations and unstable enrollment,” negatively impacting the campaign won out over affirming community input. In a July 10 email, Miner went so far as to say these conditions “could lead to an opposition campaign based on misinformation.”

Board of trustees President Bruce Swenson commended the outreach efforts and advocated the pursuit of community input throughout the decision-making process.

Story continues below advertisement

The bond discussion opened a window for significant change. Submitting to fear and doing nothing in the face of potential evolution is disheartening, but not surprising. Faculty and administration should have a shared vision that serves the district’s best interests and assuages fears of poor financial management.

These efforts are a promising start, but they mean nothing when the district disregards feedback. The board can easily communicate to avoid misinterpretation of intent, can work together to serve our community’s needs. The changes necessitated by budget cuts offer a chance to make legitimate change- not to trim the fat of our current model until we can stabilize enrollment, but to reevaluate, reallocate and develop. Inaction is not a viable option. We must not act out of fear but hope.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover
About the Contributor
Genevieve Kolar
Genevieve Kolar, Editor in Chief
Hey, my name is Genevieve and I find it frustrating to write about myself in the third person. I'm an applied math major from Chicago who is fascinated by human perception and the power of narrative. When I'm not nagging people about La Voz, I enjoy exploring California's natural beauty, reading, and dabbling in design. As Editor in Chief, I hope to contribute to the enrichment of our community through truthful, open discourse. If you have corrections, questions or recommendations regarding the paper or this website, please feel free to email me at [email protected]. I'm also on Instagram. Thanks for reading!  

Comments (0)

La Voz Weekly intends this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments should be respectful and constructive. We do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks or language that might be interpreted as defamatory. La Voz does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a valid name and email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comment.
All La Voz News Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest