The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

Advertisement
The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

The voice of De Anza since 1967.

La Voz News

    Womyn’s Awareness

    Unnecessary restrictions to RU-486

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration finally approved the abortion-inducing drug RU-486 after more than 12 years of battles between pro- and anti-abortion forces. Unfortunately while they approved it, the FDA attached unnecessary restrictions to the drug that will make obtaining the drug a hassle for womyn.

    According to the Associated Press, the drug, originally developed in France, blocks a hormone, progesterone, which in turn causes the lining of the uterine wall to thin resulting in a spontaneous abortion. The drug is more than 90 percent effect in causing an abortion if taken within 49 days of the beginning of a woman’s last menstrual period.

    In a bizarre, though not unexpected move, the FDA placed numerous restrictions on RU486 approving it only for distribution by doctors who, according to the Associated Press, “can operate in case a surgical abortion is needed to finish the job or in cases of severe bleeding – or to doctors who have made advance arrangements for a surgeon to provide such care to their patients.”

    This is ridiculous. Should surgeons who perform back surgery be the only medical professionals able to dispense medication for back pain? Millions of people see non-surgeons for heart and other ailments, which might later call for surgery without needing to find a doctor, who himself, is a surgeon.

    Story continues below advertisement

    President-elect George W. Bush opposes abortion; his father’s administration banned RU-486 from this country in 1989. Many people think that Bush’s selection for Attorney General, John Ashcroft, would ban birth control pills and IUDs, deny emergency contraception of a woman who’s been raped and force a girl, pregnant from incest, to bear a child, even at the risk of her health.

    What did the Clinton-Gore administration do for the past seven years, while the FDA stood around and dragged its feet on a drug approval that should have been extraordinarily routine? Absolutely nothing.

    They apparently didn’t try to dissuade the FDA from the needless conditions they attached to the drug.

    -Source: FDA approves abortion pill. The Associated Press, September 28, 2000.

    Leave a Comment
    More to Discover

    Comments (0)

    La Voz Weekly intends this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments should be respectful and constructive. We do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks or language that might be interpreted as defamatory. La Voz does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a valid name and email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comment.
    All La Voz News Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest